New ask Hacker News story: Tell HN: Submit comments on IRS guidance to SEC 174 expenses
Tell HN: Submit comments on IRS guidance to SEC 174 expenses
2 by mNovak | 0 comments on Hacker News.
Public comments can be submitted regarding IRS Notice 2023-63 "Guidance on Amortization of Specified Research or Experimental Expenditures under Section 174," here: https://ift.tt/8jdaQwf The guidance in question can be found here: https://ift.tt/rGdck9D There was previous discussion of these rules on HN here: https://ift.tt/caUAY8m To very briefly summarize, these rules force certain research expenses to be treated under Section 174 and thus capitalized and amortized over a period of 5 years, instead of under Section 162 (ordinary and necessary business expenses) which are immediately deducted in the year they occur. Part of the issue is the extremely broad classification of "research expenses". Notably, it classifies virtually all software development as research, as well as the proportional share of all overhead/fringe expenses. It also changes the treatment of contracted research activities (note that includes software). This has a hugely negative impact for early-stage startups, contract research firms (i.e. SBIR companies), and independent software developers. To construct a basic example: Revenue: $100k Expenses: $100k (developer salaries) Net operating income: $0 Taxable income: $100k - 0.1x100k = $90k (first year deduction is 10% of SREs) Come tax time, you now owe the government $18-30k taxes on your $0 real income.
2 by mNovak | 0 comments on Hacker News.
Public comments can be submitted regarding IRS Notice 2023-63 "Guidance on Amortization of Specified Research or Experimental Expenditures under Section 174," here: https://ift.tt/8jdaQwf The guidance in question can be found here: https://ift.tt/rGdck9D There was previous discussion of these rules on HN here: https://ift.tt/caUAY8m To very briefly summarize, these rules force certain research expenses to be treated under Section 174 and thus capitalized and amortized over a period of 5 years, instead of under Section 162 (ordinary and necessary business expenses) which are immediately deducted in the year they occur. Part of the issue is the extremely broad classification of "research expenses". Notably, it classifies virtually all software development as research, as well as the proportional share of all overhead/fringe expenses. It also changes the treatment of contracted research activities (note that includes software). This has a hugely negative impact for early-stage startups, contract research firms (i.e. SBIR companies), and independent software developers. To construct a basic example: Revenue: $100k Expenses: $100k (developer salaries) Net operating income: $0 Taxable income: $100k - 0.1x100k = $90k (first year deduction is 10% of SREs) Come tax time, you now owe the government $18-30k taxes on your $0 real income.
Comments
Post a Comment