New ask Hacker News story: Ask HN: How to deal with AI generated sloppy code
Ask HN: How to deal with AI generated sloppy code
5 by ilrwbwrkhv | 4 comments on Hacker News.
So this is something for my fellow hackers. I run a successful tech business and I also consult others who want to start their own businesses. Now this is a problem I'm seeing other tech CEOs start doing which is use AI to have the code written for them by either using some sort of editor plugin or by using something like Cursor. The problem is that the code that is generated is usually humongous. There is just huge amounts of types and indirection and functions, calling functions and doing all sorts of nonsense which can be done manually, much simpler with fewer lines of code. This is creating huge amounts of AI-generated slop. Now when I come in to consult some of these tech architectures it takes me a really long time to figure out how to improve things because there is so much of indirection in the code base and the more troubling thing is that there are errors hidden in the architecture which earlier I would easily find out, but now it requires me to go through every single line of code. In some of the worst cases, there have been bugs which have taken down their system and then they come and blame me for not being able to find it. This is the same problem that I had with Java shops. A lot of Java programmers immediately start using a lot of classes and objects because they had for a very long time superior tooling and IDEs. My theory is that Java is actually a pretty reasonable good language but because there is such easy tooling and easy autocomplete you can almost always increase the huge web of classes and objects because you can immediately reach for them by pressing a dot. Now take that and increase it like 10x with all of this AI generated code. The medium is what influences what the code generated or written is. So how are you all handling this problem? Do you find this to be a big problem in the code bases that you see? It's also hard to tell them not to use AI because the code does work. I would say even most of the times the code does work. But it's just written in the worst possible manner and maintaining it long term is going to be so much harder if instead they had just handwritten the code.
5 by ilrwbwrkhv | 4 comments on Hacker News.
So this is something for my fellow hackers. I run a successful tech business and I also consult others who want to start their own businesses. Now this is a problem I'm seeing other tech CEOs start doing which is use AI to have the code written for them by either using some sort of editor plugin or by using something like Cursor. The problem is that the code that is generated is usually humongous. There is just huge amounts of types and indirection and functions, calling functions and doing all sorts of nonsense which can be done manually, much simpler with fewer lines of code. This is creating huge amounts of AI-generated slop. Now when I come in to consult some of these tech architectures it takes me a really long time to figure out how to improve things because there is so much of indirection in the code base and the more troubling thing is that there are errors hidden in the architecture which earlier I would easily find out, but now it requires me to go through every single line of code. In some of the worst cases, there have been bugs which have taken down their system and then they come and blame me for not being able to find it. This is the same problem that I had with Java shops. A lot of Java programmers immediately start using a lot of classes and objects because they had for a very long time superior tooling and IDEs. My theory is that Java is actually a pretty reasonable good language but because there is such easy tooling and easy autocomplete you can almost always increase the huge web of classes and objects because you can immediately reach for them by pressing a dot. Now take that and increase it like 10x with all of this AI generated code. The medium is what influences what the code generated or written is. So how are you all handling this problem? Do you find this to be a big problem in the code bases that you see? It's also hard to tell them not to use AI because the code does work. I would say even most of the times the code does work. But it's just written in the worst possible manner and maintaining it long term is going to be so much harder if instead they had just handwritten the code.
Comments
Post a Comment